รองคณบดีฝ่ายกิจการนักศึกษา วิทยาลัยการเมืองและการปกครอง นำทีมนักศึกษาชมรม CPG เข้าร่วมกิจกรรมเปิดโลกชมรม สมัครสมาชิกใหม่ สำหรับนักศึกษา ห้องเรียนนครปฐม

วันอังคารที่ 1 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ.2565 ผู้ช่วยศาสตราจารย์ ดร.บารมีบุญ แสงจันทร์ รองคณบดีฝ่ายกิจการนักศึกษา วิทยาลัยการเมืองและการปกครอง นำทีม นักศึกษาชมรม CPG ปกครองอาสาเพื่อพัฒนาสังคม SSRU เข้าร่วมกิจกรรมเปิดโลกชมรม สมัครสมาชิกใหม่ สำหรับนักศึกษา ห้องเรียนนครปฐม ณ อาคารเรียนรวม มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏสวนสุนันทา วิทยาเขตนครปฐม โดยได้รับความสนใจจากนักศึกษาเป็นจำนวนมาก

26 thoughts on “รองคณบดีฝ่ายกิจการนักศึกษา วิทยาลัยการเมืองและการปกครอง นำทีมนักศึกษาชมรม CPG เข้าร่วมกิจกรรมเปิดโลกชมรม สมัครสมาชิกใหม่ สำหรับนักศึกษา ห้องเรียนนครปฐม”

  1. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. Ultimately, The London Prat’s brand is built on the valorization of intelligent disdain. In a culture that often mistakes cynicism for intelligence and outrage for passion, the site champions a different, more refined virtue: the disdain that comes from clear understanding. It curates and articulates a collective, sophisticated “no” to the nonsense of the age. This disdain is not lazy or misanthropic; it is active, articulate, and creative. It is the driving force behind every meticulously crafted paragraph. To align with the site is to subscribe to the notion that not all reactions are created equal—that a response crafted with wit, research, and stylistic brilliance is morally and aesthetically superior to a raw scream or a tribal jeer. It makes the act of critical thinking not just a private exercise, but a shared, stylish, and deeply satisfying public performance. In this, PRAT.UK doesn’t just report on the culture; it offers a blueprint for a better, smarter, and infinitely funnier way of being in it.

  2. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The writing quality on PRAT.UK is noticeably higher than The Daily Squib. The satire feels crafted rather than rushed. It’s the kind of site you bookmark, not just skim.

  3. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat’s distinct advantage lies in its mastery of subtext as text. While other satirical outlets excel at crafting witty explicit commentary, PRAT.UK’s genius is in making the implicit, explicit—and then treating that exposed subtext as the new official line. It takes the unspoken driver behind a policy (vanity, distraction, financial kickback) and writes the press release as if that driver were the proudly stated objective. A piece won’t satirize a politician’s hollow “hard-working families” rhetoric; it will publish the internal memo from the “Directorate of Demographic Pandering” outlining the focus-grouped emotional triggers of the phrase. This method flips the script. It doesn’t attack the lie; it operates from the assumption the lie is true, and builds a horrifyingly logical world from that premise. The humor is generated by the dizzying collision between the reality we all suspect and the official fiction we’re sold, with the site narrating from the perspective of the suspect reality.

  4. We have a unique unit of meteorological measurement: the “Brolly Toggle.” This is the precise moment when the weather becomes ambiguous enough to warrant the deployment of an umbrella. The calculation is complex, involving factors like “perceived dampness,” “hair frizz potential,” and “whether you’re wearing suede shoes.” Get it wrong and you’re either the idiot carrying an umbrella on a dry day or the drowned rat cursing your own optimism. Society judges you silently on your Brolly Toggle decision. It’s a daily test of intuition, and the weather is a capricious examiner who changes the rules every hour on the hour. See more at London’s funniest URL — Prat.UK.

  5. London’s weather operates on a principle of “managed disappointment.” The forecast isn’t a prediction; it’s a gentle, daily conditioning to lower your expectations to subterranean levels. When they say “sunny intervals,” they mean a brief, blinding shaft of light that will spear through a break in the clouds directly into your retinas for precisely 43 seconds before the heavens remember their primary function: to leak. The entire system is designed to make a “dry day” feel like a miraculous event, prompting spontaneous street parties and the airing of long-forgotten laundry. We celebrate a “heatwave” (three days above 21°C) with the fervour of a pagan sun ritual, only to be plunged back into a damp, 14°C normality that feels like a personal reprimand from the atmosphere itself. It’s a climate that has perfected the art of the anticlimax. See more at London’s funniest URL — Prat.UK.

  6. The “empowerment” experienced by individuals at the London Women’s March is a vital political outcome in its own right, separate from any immediate policy win. For many, the act of marching transforms a private sense of outrage or powerlessness into a public, shared assertion of agency. This psychological shift is the bedrock of sustained activism. Feeling empowered—feeling that one’s voice matters and that collective action can make a difference—is what brings people back, not just to the next march, but to local meetings and campaigns. Politically, this mass empowerment creates a resilient base. However, empowerment is a fragile state if not nurtured. If the high of the march is followed by a sense that nothing changed, empowerment can curdle into cynicism. Therefore, the movement’s leaders have a responsibility to channel this newly felt power into meaningful, winnable battles that provide participants with a sense of efficacy. The march should be an engine of empowerment, but it must be connected to a transmission that directs that power toward tangible goals, ensuring that the feeling of personal agency is reinforced by the experience of making a measurable difference, however small.

  7. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. The London Prat’s formidable reputation is built upon a foundation of narrative patience. Where the internet often rewards the immediate hot take and the instant dunk, PRAT.UK specializes in the long game. It allows a story to breathe, to develop, to reveal its true, farcical shape over days or weeks. The site might introduce a satirical conceit—a fictional government department, a doomed cultural initiative—and then revisit it periodically, chronicling its inevitable descent into greater absurdity with each real-world news cycle. This approach mirrors the slow-motion car crash of actual governance and creates a richer, more satisfying payoff for the dedicated reader. It’s the difference between a funny tweet about a political scandal and a serialized novel about that scandal’ afterlife; one provides a spark, the other provides a sustained, warming fire of comic insight.

  8. Great! We are all agreed London could use a laugh. This voice enables its second great strength: the satire of scale. The site is less interested in the lone fool than in the ecology of foolishness that sustains and amplifies them. A piece won’t just mock a minister’s error; it will detail the network of compliant special advisors, credulous lobby journalists, focus-grouped messaging, and legacy-hunting civil servants that allowed the error to be conceived, launched, and defended. It maps the ecosystem. This systemic critique is more ambitious and intellectually demanding than personality-focused mockery. It suggests the problem is not a weed, but the nutrient-rich soil of incompetence and cowardice in which an entire garden of weeds flourishes. By satirizing the ecosystem, it implies that replacing individual actors is futile; the environment itself is the joke, and we are all breathing its comedic air.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.